https://bit.ly/3VZwFXq
https://bit.ly/3uRnA79
https://bit.ly/3HGjV3w
https://bit.ly/3W2FijJ
https://bit.ly/3W12xLf
https://bit.ly/3W4hFra
https://bit.ly/3hq2PfJ
https://bit.ly/3HATAE5
https://bit.ly/3VZnrdv
https://bit.ly/3uU57Xj
Most guys aren’t like that, or not all the time, anyway. The guys who think like this and have no problem attracting women are pretty rare. We’re out there, but we’re usually happily married by our mid-twenties. I would be too, but some wars got in the way of that.
Jennifer says:
September 17, 2011 at 10:58 pm
“Some Game truths are horribly harsh”
Some Game advice is full of holes, too, or unhealthy, or even false; a lot of sites even contradict each other. I recommend you stick to Susan, LaLa, and be cautious; not everything labeled “red pill” is true. Even some of the better sites, like Athol Kay, have crap with the soil, and even some of the accurate advice is not the most moral or healthy to apply (playing mind games with women to get them insecure and more loyal). Some moron on Badger’s blog just recommended some of Roissy’s poison and said the “hens won’t like it.” Actually, the hens are amused at how deceived some of the cocks are.
Esau says:
September 17, 2011 at 11:11 pm
A simple way to describe the Apex Fallacy in action is just to observe a woman using the general word “men” when describing something that is, in reality, only true for a small minority of high-status, attractive men. Examples abound:
Woman’s statement: Men have a lot of sexual choice and opportunity and rarely get rejected.
Truth: High-status, attractive men have a lot of sexual choice and opportunity, and rarely get rejected.
Woman’s statement: Men don’t have to bother to put effort into relationships.
Truth: High-status, attractive men don’t have to bother to put effort into relationships.
Woman’s statement: The freedoms opened up by the sexual revolution has mostly benefited men.
Truth: The freedoms opened up by the sexual revolution has mostly benefited high-status, attractive men.
(The last one echos the misconception Susan herself had when she started out blogging. She has since wised up, but you can read exactly the same fallacy marbled throughout the MSM; look up Kay Hymowitz for a recent and much-discussed example.)
And so on and so on; I’m sure the pattern is clear. You can easily detect a woman who’s unknowingly suffering the Apex Fallacy by observing that (i) she writes or says some generalization about men which is prima facie ridiculous, but (ii) is perfectly reasonable once you do the back-substitution, that “men” really meant “high-status, attractive men”.
{"text":"text","html5":"html","css":"css","javascript":"javascript","php":"php","python":"python","ruby":"ruby","lua":"lua","bash":"sh","erlang":"erlang","go":"golang","c":"c_cpp","cpp":"c_cpp","diff":"diff","latex":"latex","sql":"sql","xml":"xml","0":"text","abap":"abap","actionscript":"actionscript","actionscript3":"actionscript","ada":"ada","apache":"apache_conf","applescript":"applescript","asm":"assembly_x86","autohotkey":"autohotkey","closure":"closure","cobol":"cobol","coffeescript":"coffee","cpp-winapi":"c_cpp","c_loadrunner":"c_cpp","c_mac":"c_cpp","c_winapi":"c_cpp","csharp":"csharp","d":"d","dart":"dart","dot":"dot","eiffel":"eiffel","fortran":"fortran","groovy":"groovy","haskell":"haskell","haxe":"haxe","ini":"ini","io":"io","java":"java","java5":"java","make":"makefile","matlab":"matlab","mysql":"mysql","objc":"objectivec","ocaml":"ocaml","pascal":"pascal","perl":"perl","perl6":"perl","postgresql":"pgsql","powershell":"powershell","prolog":"prolog","properties":"properties","rails":"ruby","rust":"rust","scala":"scala","scheme":"scheme","smarty":"smarty","tcl":"tcl","vala":"vala","vb":"vbscript","verilog":"verilog","vhdl":"vhdl","yaml":"yaml"}