Feminism is about activism and change
https://bit.ly/3gt34p8
https://bit.ly/3MQo3hP
https://bit.ly/3gmrKzH
https://bit.ly/3TElnWT
https://bit.ly/3CSutIP
https://bit.ly/3CLIZSs
https://bit.ly/3TIc5sO
https://bit.ly/3gusQJX
I personally have waffled back and forth on the issue of birth control. It would be easy for me to take the high road since I've had infertility problems and never needed to make a stand on this issue. But I also think some people are plainly not cut out for parenting a lot of children and, of course, poverty and lack of education are very problematic as well. I think in the US, though, birth control in its various forms has been abused beyond belief – so that sex has not been pushed into the merely recreational zone, but far beyond into meaningless, rather apathetic interaction.
My recent post Piece of Advice #26: Watch North and South
ATS says:
April 28, 2010 at 3:58 pm
Well, the Catholic Church here in the Philippines DOES interfere with women's lives–they block government policies which are not in line with their beliefs as I've outlined below in my replies to nova and grerp, and I've provided a link to give readers here a clearer picture of just how pervasive the Church's influence is in my country.
dan_brodribb says:
April 28, 2010 at 4:35 pm
Cult, I'm glad you're here, but I'm confused as to the point you're trying to make.
My recent post Friends Without Benefits (Part 2): Let's Just Be Friends Edition
dan_brodribb says:
April 28, 2010 at 4:55 pm
Cult, I'm glad you're here, but I'm having trouble following your argument.
(sorry if this is a repost, comments seem to be a bit wobbly)
My recent post Friends Without Benefits (Part 2): Let's Just Be Friends Edition
stormraven17 says:
April 28, 2010 at 6:13 pm
Wrong. Men don't need women to be sex-positive in order for themselves to be sex positive. Men are generally by default sex-positive because that's how our bodies are built. Blame God / Mother Nature/ whatever if you want but it doesn't change the fact that it's the 21st century and humanity hasn't physically changed within this time. Both genders could reach "equality" if there's a genetic breakthrough that allows viruses to rewrite our DNA but gender issues would be the least of our worries if such a virus were created.
Susan isn't saying that there's anything wrong with sex-positive women. She's saying that Moe and cohorts are portraying sex, and unprotected sex at that, as the only way to feminine liberation. Guys are encoded with the desire to get it on as much as possible but why seek freedom by giving out sex like candy?
{"text":"text","html5":"html","css":"css","javascript":"javascript","php":"php","python":"python","ruby":"ruby","lua":"lua","bash":"sh","erlang":"erlang","go":"golang","c":"c_cpp","cpp":"c_cpp","diff":"diff","latex":"latex","sql":"sql","xml":"xml","0":"text","abap":"abap","actionscript":"actionscript","actionscript3":"actionscript","ada":"ada","apache":"apache_conf","applescript":"applescript","asm":"assembly_x86","autohotkey":"autohotkey","closure":"closure","cobol":"cobol","coffeescript":"coffee","cpp-winapi":"c_cpp","c_loadrunner":"c_cpp","c_mac":"c_cpp","c_winapi":"c_cpp","csharp":"csharp","d":"d","dart":"dart","dot":"dot","eiffel":"eiffel","fortran":"fortran","groovy":"groovy","haskell":"haskell","haxe":"haxe","ini":"ini","io":"io","java":"java","java5":"java","make":"makefile","matlab":"matlab","mysql":"mysql","objc":"objectivec","ocaml":"ocaml","pascal":"pascal","perl":"perl","perl6":"perl","postgresql":"pgsql","powershell":"powershell","prolog":"prolog","properties":"properties","rails":"ruby","rust":"rust","scala":"scala","scheme":"scheme","smarty":"smarty","tcl":"tcl","vala":"vala","vb":"vbscript","verilog":"verilog","vhdl":"vhdl","yaml":"yaml"}